• Technosailor.com
  • Desk of the Editor
  • Entrepreneurship
  • Web Marketing
  • Tech Policy
  • Contenido Español
Technosailor
  • Blog
  • Authors
  • Twitter Pitch Me!
  • Disclosures
  • Advertise on Technosailor.com
Apr
27
2006

Enterprise 2.0 or what I call “Swimming in KoolAid”

Posted by: Steven Fisher

QUESTION: First when was there ever an Enterprise 1.0? Then, why are we calling this Enterprise 2.0?

ANSWER: Because we are trying to prevent most “Web 2.0″ products from becoming irrelevant rehashes of stuff people tried selling five years ago by jamming it down the throats of CIO’s and CTO’s.

There is even a “CTO’s Guide to Web 2.0“.

I do believe that the Enterprise can implement Wiki’s and leverage systems that can do things like “Persistent Search” but come on, how is MySpace going to impact your company?

Some people are talking about how the Social Web is the new Intranet. No, it is just new features on an already mature platform. First is was Intranets, then it was Portals now it is Social Webs. Come on, give me a break. There is merit in bringing social networking into the enterprise, but what this originally was called was an Expertise Portal. Back in the day (1999) portals were the rage and we classified them as either Application, Information, or Expertise Portals. As if they had to be separate. That was stupid. Now they are just “The Intranet”. Leveraging Social Networking is important when you are IBM and you need to find that AS/400 guy in Alaska that can do something in particular.

Companies like LinkedIn should have an Enterprise Platform but it looks like Visible Path just beat them to it.

I tend to agree with Charlene Li that “Ajax and wikis would be Web 2.0″ and “The people-to-people companies the rest of us� throw into the Web 2.0 bucket?such as Riya, Flock and Edgeio, Charlene calls Social Computing companies.”

I believe that my colleague over at the “Trend Junkie” that tools like Individual RSS will transform companies internally and how the communicate with customers and prospects.

In any regards, this is just “new technology applied to old problems in search of the same solutions” - not Enterprise 2.0. So stop swimming in the KoolAid and get back to work. :)

  • Add to Mixx!
  • Stumble it!
About the Author: Steve is currently CEO of the SlipStream Aviation Solutions, Inc., an aviation software company. Steve is also an expert in personal branding and is an avid pilot, musician and photographer. He currently resides in Columbia, MD, USA.
Tagged: 2.0 Everything, Analysis/Opinion, Social Media, Tech Industry, Venture Files at 3:32 pm -
discussion by DISQUS
Add New Comment
Go to Forum —  Track Comments —  Comments RSS
Viewing 1 comment — Sort by:
    • ^
    • v
    • unverified
    • Profile
    • Website
    • Permalink
    wolske —2 years ago with 1 point

    Please login to rate. (hide)

    stop swimming in the kool-aid? I thought that was my line...

    reply — You are replying anonymously. Login
  • Recent Posts

    • Understanding our Future by Understanding our Past
    • Ford EcoBoost Cuts CO2 Emissions by 15%, Improves Gas Mileage
    • 5 Things Small Businesses Can Do To “Be Green”
    • You Don’t have to be an Environmentalist to Have Green Habits
    • Telecommuting, anyone?
  • Recent Comments

    Powered by Disqus
  • Tags

    Aaron Brazell Advertising Apple b5media Blogging book conferences Design entrepreneurship Facebook Finance and Funding Google guest_blogging holidays humor hurricanes_and_natural_disasters interesting job Links Marketing Music nfl Op-Ed Perfect Pitch personal politics pr Predictions productivity Programming Security Social Issues Social Media Social Networking social_issues Sports Tech Industry Technology Technosailor Travel twitter unix Venture Files WordPress you_can_blog

  • License Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 | Copyright © 2004 - 2008 - Aaron Brazell | Lisa helped out | Privacy Policy

    Twitter Pitch!

    <p>Twitter pitching is a form of pitch that requires succint "what does this mean for me" kind of pitching. It is the ultimate efficiency of words. You have 140 characters or less to tell me why your pitch matters to me or my readers. Please include a means of contacting you. This is included in your 140 characters. If you send successive pitches, you will likely be ignored, unless it's obvious that the first pitch was a case of "accidental send", etc.</p> <p>This form of pitching does not mean I'm being a diva. It means that my time is valuable, and you want a piece of it. It's good practice for you, and delivers your pitch in a format I want. Win-win.</p>


    (X) Close

    Twitter Pitch Me!