Lesson Number One when building traffic to your website: follow Google’s rules.
Lesson Number Two and a follow on of Rule Number One: Don’t play the link farm game.
The story is from Search Engine Journal where Loren reports that Link Vault has been banned from the Google index, and thus, all the link exchanges that they facilitated. This is a very important development for those of us who practice sound search engine optimization policies and practices.
You’ll notice at Technosailor that there are a number of things that I don’t do that many other websites DO do. For one, I don’t have a blogroll. This is because I believe in filtering the wealth of information I come across and find out what I think is important for my blog and my readers. Instead of a blogroll, I link to other people in the context of posts. This is important because it provides the best possible context for my links without appearing to be haphazardly sending links across the internet.
You might ask why having a blogroll is, in my opinion, “haphazardly sending links” and why this is necessarily bad. Really, it comes down to how Google and Yahoo and other search engines determine the importance of sites. An “important” site having a high pagerank delivers more “weight” to a website or blog than a less “important” site would, thus changing how the search engines deliver results and provide relevance to the search context. In other words, a link from CNN outweighs a link from a low-traffic blog. Having a blogroll, dissipates the effect of this “weighting” making it more irrelevant if Google doesn’t step in and normalize their results. (Added: Blogrolls do not necessarily mean getting penalized by search engines. I’m just noting it as “something” that I avoid.)
Secondly, you’ll notice that I don’t participate in link-exchanges. I get emails all the time asking for link exchanges where I’ll post a link for someone in exchange for a link back to me on their site. This is “hamming” the system and it also reduces the quality of search engine results. If Steve Rubel approached me about a link exchange (which he won’t and has no incentive to do), I would turn him down.
Or would I?
There is an exception to the link exchange rule because, in the context of Steve Rubel, there is relevance to this blog. This blog talks about the same types of things (sometimes) that Rubel does and vica versa. However, if Steve Pavlina wanted to link exchange (which he won’t and has no incentive to do), I would turn him down. Even though he has a huge site with huge influence that would really beenfit me, my pagerank and my bottom line. He blogs about lifestyles and productivity, time management, etc. Nothing to do with this blog. I could take his link and link back to him, but the relevance is diminished.
The story of Link-Vault being banned makes me happy. No one should just haphazardly send links around the internet. I don’t see any justification for it. Ever.
{ 1 trackback }
{ 8 comments }
Hence the question I posed on my site the other day. I have a list of “Links” on my blog that I use. I don’t want that list to ever grow to HH’s or MM’s lists because no one ever looks at that list and honestly scrolls it to say “Hmmmm well if it’s listed here, it HAS TO BE WORTH READING”.
That said, the list I have is short by comparison and I don’t feel it’s needlessly tossing out links to other sites.
Your article makes a VERY valid point however that link overkill is too much of a good thing.
Hence the question I posed on my site the other day. I have a list of “Links” on my blog that I use. I don’t want that list to ever grow to HH’s or MM’s lists because no one ever looks at that list and honestly scrolls it to say “Hmmmm well if it’s listed here, it HAS TO BE WORTH READING”.
That said, the list I have is short by comparison and I don’t feel it’s needlessly tossing out links to other sites.
Your article makes a VERY valid point however that link overkill is too much of a good thing.
I have a blogroll, but they’re sites I actually read — most of them daily. I cull through once a month and delete sites that are gone, or haven’t been updated in a while. I try to keep it to a manageable list, and I’m pretty selective as to who gets on the list and who doesn’t. The last time I updated the list, I think I removed around 10 or 12 blogs — simply because the sites weren’t working or I grew tired of them and didn’t want to read them anymore.
My blogroll is like my magazine rack in the house. I cull through that once a month, too, and the “keepers” are indexed in magazine holders on the bookshelf.
Yes I am a bit anal about my reading material. :-)
I have a blogroll, but they’re sites I actually read — most of them daily. I cull through once a month and delete sites that are gone, or haven’t been updated in a while. I try to keep it to a manageable list, and I’m pretty selective as to who gets on the list and who doesn’t. The last time I updated the list, I think I removed around 10 or 12 blogs — simply because the sites weren’t working or I grew tired of them and didn’t want to read them anymore.
My blogroll is like my magazine rack in the house. I cull through that once a month, too, and the “keepers” are indexed in magazine holders on the bookshelf.
Yes I am a bit anal about my reading material. :-)
I have a blogroll, but they’re sites I actually read — most of them daily. I cull through once a month and delete sites that are gone, or haven’t been updated in a while. I try to keep it to a manageable list, and I’m pretty selective as to who gets on the list and who doesn’t. The last time I updated the list, I think I removed around 10 or 12 blogs — simply because the sites weren’t working or I grew tired of them and didn’t want to read them anymore.
My blogroll is like my magazine rack in the house. I cull through that once a month, too, and the “keepers” are indexed in magazine holders on the bookshelf.
Yes I am a bit anal about my reading material. :-)
I agree Carol, and I don’t think it’s wrong to do it that way. I just can’t stand heading to a blogsite, or even Drudge just to scroll through a list of links to different sites that they probably don’t even read.
There is such a thing as too much. I think that a mile long list of links is one of them.
I agree Carol, and I don’t think it’s wrong to do it that way. I just can’t stand heading to a blogsite, or even Drudge just to scroll through a list of links to different sites that they probably don’t even read.
There is such a thing as too much. I think that a mile long list of links is one of them.
I agree Carol, and I don’t think it’s wrong to do it that way. I just can’t stand heading to a blogsite, or even Drudge just to scroll through a list of links to different sites that they probably don’t even read.
There is such a thing as too much. I think that a mile long list of links is one of them.
Comments on this entry are closed.