Comments on: Social Networking 4.0 – Meta Social Networks http://technosailor.com/2007/02/13/social-networking-40-meta-social-networks/ Business and Technology with Common Sense Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:20:04 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-alpha-19888 By: Graham Jones - Internet Psychologist http://technosailor.com/2007/02/13/social-networking-40-meta-social-networks/comment-page-1/#comment-41876 Graham Jones - Internet Psychologist Thu, 05 Jun 2008 16:19:25 +0000 http://www.venturefiles.com/2007/02/13/social-networking-40-meta-social-networks/#comment-41876 I agree with your sentiments. I wrote about the need for social networking portability almost two years ago. http://www.grahamjones.co.uk/2006/10/social-networking-dont-invest-in-it.htm I agree with your sentiments. I wrote about the need for social networking portability almost two years ago.

http://www.grahamjones.co.uk/2006/10/social-networking-dont-invest-in-it.htm

]]> By: Matt Robson http://technosailor.com/2007/02/13/social-networking-40-meta-social-networks/comment-page-1/#comment-41875 Matt Robson Thu, 15 Feb 2007 14:59:19 +0000 http://www.venturefiles.com/2007/02/13/social-networking-40-meta-social-networks/#comment-41875 yes, I fully agree with the need for homogenized standard document types and meta-data to be used across search networks. the Social network standard is XFN. Also, OWL is going to be very important in the emerging semantic web that unifies identity. http://wakeupweb2.blogspot.com http://connectsociety.com yes, I fully agree with the need for homogenized standard document types and meta-data to be used across search networks.

the Social network standard is XFN.

Also, OWL is going to be very important in the emerging semantic web that unifies identity.

http://wakeupweb2.blogspot.com

http://connectsociety.com

]]>