<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:icbm="http://www.postneo.com/icbm/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Letter to Google, Feedburner</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technosailor.com/2007/05/24/open-letter-to-google-feedburner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technosailor.com/2007/05/24/open-letter-to-google-feedburner/</link>
	<description>Web Technology and Real Life Merge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 03:27:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0-alpha</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amit Dixit</title>
		<link>http://technosailor.com/2007/05/24/open-letter-to-google-feedburner/comment-page-1/#comment-116343</link>
		<dc:creator>Amit Dixit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 01:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technosailor.com/open-letter-to-google-feedburner/#comment-116343</guid>
		<description>Feedburner has more potential than its price of $100 million......I really admire Google :)...in future this deal will be more fruitful for Google than their acquisition of doulbleclick.....funny thing is; Not in terms of Ad Network.

As, a feedburner user i really expect its identity to kept intact by Google. Good luck / Congratulation to Both of Them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feedburner has more potential than its price of $100 million&#8230;&#8230;I really admire Google :)&#8230;in future this deal will be more fruitful for Google than their acquisition of doulbleclick&#8230;..funny thing is; Not in terms of Ad Network.</p>
<p>As, a feedburner user i really expect its identity to kept intact by Google. Good luck / Congratulation to Both of Them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis Seitler</title>
		<link>http://technosailor.com/2007/05/24/open-letter-to-google-feedburner/comment-page-1/#comment-91726</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis Seitler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 03:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technosailor.com/open-letter-to-google-feedburner/#comment-91726</guid>
		<description>...yeah, I just meant &quot;little guys&quot; as compared to Google, Yahoo, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;yeah, I just meant &#8220;little guys&#8221; as compared to Google, Yahoo, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://technosailor.com/2007/05/24/open-letter-to-google-feedburner/comment-page-1/#comment-91696</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 00:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technosailor.com/open-letter-to-google-feedburner/#comment-91696</guid>
		<description>This is a bad day for the web publishing community. How long before Big G buy up all the competition?

They are now adopting a new rule. Purchase or Punish. If a competitor is amenable to being purchased, then do it. If not, then punish them in the SERPs.

I am so unbelievably pissed off with this &quot;deal&quot; it&#039;s not true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a bad day for the web publishing community. How long before Big G buy up all the competition?</p>
<p>They are now adopting a new rule. Purchase or Punish. If a competitor is amenable to being purchased, then do it. If not, then punish them in the SERPs.</p>
<p>I am so unbelievably pissed off with this &#8220;deal&#8221; it&#8217;s not true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary King</title>
		<link>http://technosailor.com/2007/05/24/open-letter-to-google-feedburner/comment-page-1/#comment-91659</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 22:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technosailor.com/open-letter-to-google-feedburner/#comment-91659</guid>
		<description>FeedBurner _owns_ that market. They aren&#039;t the little guy. They are synonymous with &#039;feed stats&#039;. You practically expect most feeds to use FeedBurner these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FeedBurner _owns_ that market. They aren&#8217;t the little guy. They are synonymous with &#8216;feed stats&#8217;. You practically expect most feeds to use FeedBurner these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Brazell</title>
		<link>http://technosailor.com/2007/05/24/open-letter-to-google-feedburner/comment-page-1/#comment-91636</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Brazell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 21:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technosailor.com/open-letter-to-google-feedburner/#comment-91636</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know of anyone who considers FeedBurner to be &quot;the little guy&quot;. Remember &lt;a href=&quot;http://technosailor.com/podcast-rick-klau-of-feedburner/&quot;&gt;the podcast interview with Rick Klau&lt;/a&gt; where we were talking about the market share that FB has.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know of anyone who considers FeedBurner to be &#8220;the little guy&#8221;. Remember <a href="http://technosailor.com/podcast-rick-klau-of-feedburner/">the podcast interview with Rick Klau</a> where we were talking about the market share that FB has.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis Seitler</title>
		<link>http://technosailor.com/2007/05/24/open-letter-to-google-feedburner/comment-page-1/#comment-91628</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis Seitler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 20:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technosailor.com/open-letter-to-google-feedburner/#comment-91628</guid>
		<description>I have to admit that I would love to be behind a tool that I could sell in a few years for $100 million.

On the other hand, I wouldn&#039;t want to screw over people who fell in love with that tool specifically because it was run by &quot;one of the little guys.&quot; As much as I like Google, they&#039;re beginning to creep me out...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit that I would love to be behind a tool that I could sell in a few years for $100 million.</p>
<p>On the other hand, I wouldn&#8217;t want to screw over people who fell in love with that tool specifically because it was run by &#8220;one of the little guys.&#8221; As much as I like Google, they&#8217;re beginning to creep me out&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
