<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:icbm="http://www.postneo.com/icbm/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PR Roundtable Discussion: Outing Bad PR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technosailor.com/2007/11/08/pr-roundtable-discussion-outing-bad-pr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technosailor.com/2007/11/08/pr-roundtable-discussion-outing-bad-pr/</link>
	<description>Web Technology and Real Life Merge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 02:16:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0-alpha</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Frangos</title>
		<link>http://technosailor.com/2007/11/08/pr-roundtable-discussion-outing-bad-pr/comment-page-1/#comment-143669</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Frangos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 18:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technosailor.com/2007/11/08/pr-roundtable-discussion-outing-bad-pr/#comment-143669</guid>
		<description>Hi -
I am an Editor for an online Magazine now, but in the past worked in the PR profession.  The important thing from a PR perspective was getting your story placed -- and that happened when you provided valuable material with the least amount of spin possible.  So, that&#039;s what I look for when PR folks contact me.  Sure, I get SPAM.. what&#039;s new?  That&#039;s why I have SPAM blockers, and since Chris made a point that he had them too -- what else is needed?  Every spam blocked PR agent is an ineffective PR agent.  Period.  End of story.  -30- 

Yours, Scott</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi -<br />
I am an Editor for an online Magazine now, but in the past worked in the PR profession.  The important thing from a PR perspective was getting your story placed &#8212; and that happened when you provided valuable material with the least amount of spin possible.  So, that&#8217;s what I look for when PR folks contact me.  Sure, I get SPAM.. what&#8217;s new?  That&#8217;s why I have SPAM blockers, and since Chris made a point that he had them too &#8212; what else is needed?  Every spam blocked PR agent is an ineffective PR agent.  Period.  End of story.  -30- </p>
<p>Yours, Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Haslam</title>
		<link>http://technosailor.com/2007/11/08/pr-roundtable-discussion-outing-bad-pr/comment-page-1/#comment-141091</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Haslam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 15:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technosailor.com/2007/11/08/pr-roundtable-discussion-outing-bad-pr/#comment-141091</guid>
		<description>Geoff, I agree-- Chris did take a hit. It may be that he just doesn&#039;t care, I don&#039;t know. I would argue that the personal brand hit reflects on the Wired Magazine brand as well. Not smart, but a decision he took on himself, that still has the same effect on the PR &quot;spammers.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geoff, I agree&#8211; Chris did take a hit. It may be that he just doesn&#8217;t care, I don&#8217;t know. I would argue that the personal brand hit reflects on the Wired Magazine brand as well. Not smart, but a decision he took on himself, that still has the same effect on the PR &#8220;spammers.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff Livingston</title>
		<link>http://technosailor.com/2007/11/08/pr-roundtable-discussion-outing-bad-pr/comment-page-1/#comment-141027</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Livingston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 12:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technosailor.com/2007/11/08/pr-roundtable-discussion-outing-bad-pr/#comment-141027</guid>
		<description>There is one major repercussion of outing that most outers don&#039;t consider:  The affect on their own personal brand.  

Regardless of effectiveness (and it did seem to get results), I think Andersen lost a couple of brand equity points inside the echo chamber on this one.  Many people found his approach to be Draconian, and the comments section reveals many, many readers -- BTW, not listed in the post -- who were disappointed by Chris&#039;s actions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is one major repercussion of outing that most outers don&#8217;t consider:  The affect on their own personal brand.  </p>
<p>Regardless of effectiveness (and it did seem to get results), I think Andersen lost a couple of brand equity points inside the echo chamber on this one.  Many people found his approach to be Draconian, and the comments section reveals many, many readers &#8212; BTW, not listed in the post &#8212; who were disappointed by Chris&#8217;s actions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
