<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ask Takes Your Privacy Seriously</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technosailor.com/2007/12/12/ask-takes-your-privacy-seriously/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technosailor.com/2007/12/12/ask-takes-your-privacy-seriously/</link>
	<description>Business and Technology with Common Sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 21:21:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-beta4-20883</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nishanthe</title>
		<link>http://technosailor.com/2007/12/12/ask-takes-your-privacy-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-43345</link>
		<dc:creator>Nishanthe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 05:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technosailor.com/2007/12/12/ask-takes-your-privacy-seriously/#comment-43345</guid>
		<description>Hi Aaron,
Browsers has many privacy controls inbuilt and is this feature is effective than the browser&#039;s inbuilt privacy features, or is this just a hype?
-Nish</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Aaron,<br />
Browsers has many privacy controls inbuilt and is this feature is effective than the browser&#8217;s inbuilt privacy features, or is this just a hype?<br />
-Nish</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos Granier-Phelps</title>
		<link>http://technosailor.com/2007/12/12/ask-takes-your-privacy-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-43344</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos Granier-Phelps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 01:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technosailor.com/2007/12/12/ask-takes-your-privacy-seriously/#comment-43344</guid>
		<description>Will Ask.com&#039;s Eraser delete search data already available at their servers?

For example, can I keep the personalization options while performing some searches and then have everything deleted when I&#039;m done?

I&#039;m not sure this last bit could be possible considering how many servers things are stored in, and the number of laws in place requiring data to be backed up... but it would be great.

Anyway, being able to disable features in exchange for privacy seems like a good trade-off, and it ties in nicely with Alex Rudloff&#039;s post on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alexrudloff.com/2007/12/06/privacy-as-a-currency/&quot;&gt;Privacy as a Currency&lt;/a&gt; and my take on it (&lt;a href=&quot;http://technosailor.com/2007/12/07/la-privacidad-como-moneda-2/&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will Ask.com&#8217;s Eraser delete search data already available at their servers?</p>
<p>For example, can I keep the personalization options while performing some searches and then have everything deleted when I&#8217;m done?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure this last bit could be possible considering how many servers things are stored in, and the number of laws in place requiring data to be backed up&#8230; but it would be great.</p>
<p>Anyway, being able to disable features in exchange for privacy seems like a good trade-off, and it ties in nicely with Alex Rudloff&#8217;s post on <a href="http://www.alexrudloff.com/2007/12/06/privacy-as-a-currency/">Privacy as a Currency</a> and my take on it (<a href="http://technosailor.com/2007/12/07/la-privacidad-como-moneda-2/">here</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

