<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:icbm="http://www.postneo.com/icbm/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using Images Legally on Your Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technosailor.com/2008/03/01/using-images-legally-on-your-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technosailor.com/2008/03/01/using-images-legally-on-your-blog/</link>
	<description>Web Technology and Real Life Merge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 02:16:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0-alpha</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Jo</title>
		<link>http://technosailor.com/2008/03/01/using-images-legally-on-your-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-192403</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 02:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technosailor.com/?p=2095#comment-192403</guid>
		<description>Copyright law is a civil law, and violation thereof results in civil penalties.  So while a copyright violation is not &quot;theft&quot; in the criminal sense of the word, it is &quot;theft&quot; in the civil sense of the word.  You may not go to jail, but there can still be hefty penalties.  So yes -- you are breaking the law.

Fair use is a defense, one which you are free to assert -- after you&#039;ve been sued.  But really, who wants to let it get that far?!

There is, however, a gray area on what constitutes &quot;commercial use.&quot;  Some case law supports a theory that if any profit is derived from the location where the material is used (i.e., on a blog that has ads) that it constitutes commercial use.  The majority of decisions, however, seem to support a definition of commercial use as being one where, for example, an image is used directly in an advertisement or logo.  Gotta love those gray areas of the law!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Copyright law is a civil law, and violation thereof results in civil penalties.  So while a copyright violation is not &#8220;theft&#8221; in the criminal sense of the word, it is &#8220;theft&#8221; in the civil sense of the word.  You may not go to jail, but there can still be hefty penalties.  So yes &#8212; you are breaking the law.</p>
<p>Fair use is a defense, one which you are free to assert &#8212; after you&#8217;ve been sued.  But really, who wants to let it get that far?!</p>
<p>There is, however, a gray area on what constitutes &#8220;commercial use.&#8221;  Some case law supports a theory that if any profit is derived from the location where the material is used (i.e., on a blog that has ads) that it constitutes commercial use.  The majority of decisions, however, seem to support a definition of commercial use as being one where, for example, an image is used directly in an advertisement or logo.  Gotta love those gray areas of the law!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas Karr</title>
		<link>http://technosailor.com/2008/03/01/using-images-legally-on-your-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-192397</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Karr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 01:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technosailor.com/?p=2095#comment-192397</guid>
		<description>I just didn&#039;t want folks to think they were breaking the law!  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just didn&#8217;t want folks to think they were breaking the law!  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Brazell</title>
		<link>http://technosailor.com/2008/03/01/using-images-legally-on-your-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-192391</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Brazell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 00:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technosailor.com/?p=2095#comment-192391</guid>
		<description>Actually, fair use is a defense, not a blank check. Secondly, fair use allows for the use of a portion of a work - a portion being relative to what the work is. Usually, music is 20 seconds or something like that. Use of excerpts of articles are a portion, etc. Fair use does not allow for the use of a &quot;body of work&quot; in it&#039;s entirety. If I&#039;m a lawyer (and I&#039;m not), it would seem obvious to me that the use of a copyrighted photograph is the use of a &quot;body of work&quot; as it is used in its entirety, not simply portionally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, fair use is a defense, not a blank check. Secondly, fair use allows for the use of a portion of a work &#8211; a portion being relative to what the work is. Usually, music is 20 seconds or something like that. Use of excerpts of articles are a portion, etc. Fair use does not allow for the use of a &#8220;body of work&#8221; in it&#8217;s entirety. If I&#8217;m a lawyer (and I&#8217;m not), it would seem obvious to me that the use of a copyrighted photograph is the use of a &#8220;body of work&#8221; as it is used in its entirety, not simply portionally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas Karr</title>
		<link>http://technosailor.com/2008/03/01/using-images-legally-on-your-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-192390</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Karr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 00:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technosailor.com/?p=2095#comment-192390</guid>
		<description>Actually, it&#039;s usually NOT theft.  There are fair usage laws in action.  Check out Eric Goldman&#039;s blog for additional information but very often it&#039;s okay for bloggers to utilize images - sometimes it&#039;s necessary for attribution, sometimes it is not.

Google is going through a series of these right now.  If it was truly &#039;theft&#039;, Google Image Search would be shut down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, it&#8217;s usually NOT theft.  There are fair usage laws in action.  Check out Eric Goldman&#8217;s blog for additional information but very often it&#8217;s okay for bloggers to utilize images &#8211; sometimes it&#8217;s necessary for attribution, sometimes it is not.</p>
<p>Google is going through a series of these right now.  If it was truly &#8216;theft&#8217;, Google Image Search would be shut down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
