<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:icbm="http://www.postneo.com/icbm/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Contrived Transparency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technosailor.com/2008/04/28/contrived-transparency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technosailor.com/2008/04/28/contrived-transparency/</link>
	<description>Web Technology and Real Life Merge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 02:16:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0-alpha</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Brazell</title>
		<link>http://technosailor.com/2008/04/28/contrived-transparency/comment-page-1/#comment-211322</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Brazell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technosailor.com/?p=2555#comment-211322</guid>
		<description>Hey Eric- nice to see local press around these parts. ;)

I think you&#039;re article addresses transparency as it should be addressed. The problem is, as Ike, suggests more one of tactical transparency which is simply put on to achieve a purpose and real transparency which builds trust and authenticity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Eric- nice to see local press around these parts. ;)</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re article addresses transparency as it should be addressed. The problem is, as Ike, suggests more one of tactical transparency which is simply put on to achieve a purpose and real transparency which builds trust and authenticity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ike</title>
		<link>http://technosailor.com/2008/04/28/contrived-transparency/comment-page-1/#comment-211272</link>
		<dc:creator>Ike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technosailor.com/?p=2555#comment-211272</guid>
		<description>You didn&#039;t go far enough, Aaron.

The &quot;tactically transparent&quot; hurt the rest of us through guilt by association.  I don&#039;t want to see an entire profession tainted by the actions of a few using slash-and-burn techniques.  It makes us all look bad.  Healthy skepticism is always warranted, but those taking advantage of trust risk stunting new relationships for us before they start.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You didn&#8217;t go far enough, Aaron.</p>
<p>The &#8220;tactically transparent&#8221; hurt the rest of us through guilt by association.  I don&#8217;t want to see an entire profession tainted by the actions of a few using slash-and-burn techniques.  It makes us all look bad.  Healthy skepticism is always warranted, but those taking advantage of trust risk stunting new relationships for us before they start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Elkins</title>
		<link>http://technosailor.com/2008/04/28/contrived-transparency/comment-page-1/#comment-211230</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Elkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 06:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technosailor.com/?p=2555#comment-211230</guid>
		<description>Okay, now I&#039;m feeling embarrassed, because I actually used the word in my latest post on Examiner:

http://www.examiner.com/x-301-Online-Communities-Examiner

But I meant it! I don&#039;t tell clients they need to be transparent because it gives them an advantage, I tell them they need to be up-front because then they don&#039;t look like assholes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, now I&#8217;m feeling embarrassed, because I actually used the word in my latest post on Examiner:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-301-Online-Communities-Examiner" >http://www.examiner.com/x-301-Online-Communities-Examiner</a></p>
<p>But I meant it! I don&#8217;t tell clients they need to be transparent because it gives them an advantage, I tell them they need to be up-front because then they don&#8217;t look like assholes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Eley</title>
		<link>http://technosailor.com/2008/04/28/contrived-transparency/comment-page-1/#comment-211218</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Eley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 04:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technosailor.com/?p=2555#comment-211218</guid>
		<description>Every time people do something innovative or genuine or sincere that then nets them a serious financial or social gain, it gets exploited by all the others just trying to make a buck or get their 15 minutes. Happens in every industry and walk of life. 

The funny thing is that most of the time it&#039;s pretty &quot;transparent&quot; what their real intentions are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every time people do something innovative or genuine or sincere that then nets them a serious financial or social gain, it gets exploited by all the others just trying to make a buck or get their 15 minutes. Happens in every industry and walk of life. </p>
<p>The funny thing is that most of the time it&#8217;s pretty &#8220;transparent&#8221; what their real intentions are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Brazell</title>
		<link>http://technosailor.com/2008/04/28/contrived-transparency/comment-page-1/#comment-211217</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Brazell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 04:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technosailor.com/?p=2555#comment-211217</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Chris.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Chris.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Brogan...</title>
		<link>http://technosailor.com/2008/04/28/contrived-transparency/comment-page-1/#comment-211216</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Brogan...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 04:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technosailor.com/?p=2555#comment-211216</guid>
		<description>Besides regretting not seeing you for more than 20 seconds in the hallway (or so it felt), I think you&#039;re on to something. In fact, I&#039;ve been enjoying the hell out of your blog lately. Keep it up, Aaron. I&#039;m enjoying your work here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Besides regretting not seeing you for more than 20 seconds in the hallway (or so it felt), I think you&#8217;re on to something. In fact, I&#8217;ve been enjoying the hell out of your blog lately. Keep it up, Aaron. I&#8217;m enjoying your work here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb on the Rocks</title>
		<link>http://technosailor.com/2008/04/28/contrived-transparency/comment-page-1/#comment-211215</link>
		<dc:creator>Deb on the Rocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 04:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technosailor.com/?p=2555#comment-211215</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s exactly why I hate that word in the contemporary online context.  Intentional or not, every online identity choice has layers of prompts between the communicators. If the &quot;appearance of transparency&quot; is the motivator of the online communication choice, how can that be characterized as anything but an opaque layer?

Hey, that sounds obtuse and meaningless! How do I get &quot;opaque&quot; to be the buzzword?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s exactly why I hate that word in the contemporary online context.  Intentional or not, every online identity choice has layers of prompts between the communicators. If the &#8220;appearance of transparency&#8221; is the motivator of the online communication choice, how can that be characterized as anything but an opaque layer?</p>
<p>Hey, that sounds obtuse and meaningless! How do I get &#8220;opaque&#8221; to be the buzzword?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
