http://technosailor.com/2008/07/29/memo-to-bloggers-not-everything-is-free/ Business and Technology with Common Sense Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:20:04 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-alpha-19888 http://technosailor.com/2008/07/29/memo-to-bloggers-not-everything-is-free/comment-page-1/#comment-44905 Andrew Feinberg Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:00:41 +0000 http://technosailor.com/?p=4138#comment-44905 But NYRB is not storing and archiving those books for anyone to search through and comment on, either. Nor would an author or publisher be very happy with such a service (remember the Google book search blowup?).The NYRB was also most likely provided with the text by the publisher. You were not provided with the video by Fox or NBC. You obtained it via RedLasso.If you yourself recorded, excerpted and commented on the same clip, we would have no problem.But a third party was involved, RedLasso. And RedLasso most likely had permission to redistribute under a limited set of circumstances, which their service presumably violated, prompting the lawsuit.TV -> you -> computer -> web == OK.TV -> RedLasso -> you -> web == not so OK.I am going to talk to another clipping service and a few copyright lawyers and see what they say.Hopefully I can get done with my "real work" to watch the Par-Tay tonight. Thanks for reading, Jonny! But NYRB is not storing and archiving those books for anyone to search through and comment on, either. Nor would an author or publisher be very happy with such a service (remember the Google book search blowup?).The NYRB was also most likely provided with the text by the publisher. You were not provided with the video by Fox or NBC. You obtained it via RedLasso.If you yourself recorded, excerpted and commented on the same clip, we would have no problem.But a third party was involved, RedLasso. And RedLasso most likely had permission to redistribute under a limited set of circumstances, which their service presumably violated, prompting the lawsuit.TV -> you -> computer -> web == OK.TV -> RedLasso -> you -> web == not so OK.I am going to talk to another clipping service and a few copyright lawyers and see what they say.Hopefully I can get done with my “real work” to watch the Par-Tay tonight. Thanks for reading, Jonny!

]]> http://technosailor.com/2008/07/29/memo-to-bloggers-not-everything-is-free/comment-page-1/#comment-44909 Andrew Feinberg Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:00:41 +0000 http://technosailor.com/?p=4138#comment-44909 But NYRB is not storing and archiving those books for anyone to search through and comment on, either. Nor would an author or publisher be very happy with such a service (remember the Google book search blowup?).The NYRB was also most likely provided with the text by the publisher. You were not provided with the video by Fox or NBC. You obtained it via RedLasso.If you yourself recorded, excerpted and commented on the same clip, we would have no problem.But a third party was involved, RedLasso. And RedLasso most likely had permission to redistribute under a limited set of circumstances, which their service presumably violated, prompting the lawsuit.TV -> you -> computer -> web == OK.TV -> RedLasso -> you -> web == not so OK.I am going to talk to another clipping service and a few copyright lawyers and see what they say.Hopefully I can get done with my "real work" to watch the Par-Tay tonight. Thanks for reading, Jonny! But NYRB is not storing and archiving those books for anyone to search through and comment on, either. Nor would an author or publisher be very happy with such a service (remember the Google book search blowup?).The NYRB was also most likely provided with the text by the publisher. You were not provided with the video by Fox or NBC. You obtained it via RedLasso.If you yourself recorded, excerpted and commented on the same clip, we would have no problem.But a third party was involved, RedLasso. And RedLasso most likely had permission to redistribute under a limited set of circumstances, which their service presumably violated, prompting the lawsuit.TV -> you -> computer -> web == OK.TV -> RedLasso -> you -> web == not so OK.I am going to talk to another clipping service and a few copyright lawyers and see what they say.Hopefully I can get done with my “real work” to watch the Par-Tay tonight. Thanks for reading, Jonny!

]]> http://technosailor.com/2008/07/29/memo-to-bloggers-not-everything-is-free/comment-page-1/#comment-44913 Andrew Feinberg Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:00:41 +0000 http://technosailor.com/?p=4138#comment-44913 But NYRB is not storing and archiving those books for anyone to search through and comment on, either. Nor would an author or publisher be very happy with such a service (remember the Google book search blowup?).The NYRB was also most likely provided with the text by the publisher. You were not provided with the video by Fox or NBC. You obtained it via RedLasso.If you yourself recorded, excerpted and commented on the same clip, we would have no problem.But a third party was involved, RedLasso. And RedLasso most likely had permission to redistribute under a limited set of circumstances, which their service presumably violated, prompting the lawsuit.TV -> you -> computer -> web == OK.TV -> RedLasso -> you -> web == not so OK.I am going to talk to another clipping service and a few copyright lawyers and see what they say.Hopefully I can get done with my "real work" to watch the Par-Tay tonight. Thanks for reading, Jonny! But NYRB is not storing and archiving those books for anyone to search through and comment on, either. Nor would an author or publisher be very happy with such a service (remember the Google book search blowup?).The NYRB was also most likely provided with the text by the publisher. You were not provided with the video by Fox or NBC. You obtained it via RedLasso.If you yourself recorded, excerpted and commented on the same clip, we would have no problem.But a third party was involved, RedLasso. And RedLasso most likely had permission to redistribute under a limited set of circumstances, which their service presumably violated, prompting the lawsuit.TV -> you -> computer -> web == OK.TV -> RedLasso -> you -> web == not so OK.I am going to talk to another clipping service and a few copyright lawyers and see what they say.Hopefully I can get done with my “real work” to watch the Par-Tay tonight. Thanks for reading, Jonny!

]]> http://technosailor.com/2008/07/29/memo-to-bloggers-not-everything-is-free/comment-page-1/#comment-44917 Andrew Feinberg Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:00:41 +0000 http://technosailor.com/?p=4138#comment-44917 But NYRB is not storing and archiving those books for anyone to search through and comment on, either. Nor would an author or publisher be very happy with such a service (remember the Google book search blowup?).The NYRB was also most likely provided with the text by the publisher. You were not provided with the video by Fox or NBC. You obtained it via RedLasso.If you yourself recorded, excerpted and commented on the same clip, we would have no problem.But a third party was involved, RedLasso. And RedLasso most likely had permission to redistribute under a limited set of circumstances, which their service presumably violated, prompting the lawsuit.TV -> you -> computer -> web == OK.TV -> RedLasso -> you -> web == not so OK.I am going to talk to another clipping service and a few copyright lawyers and see what they say.Hopefully I can get done with my "real work" to watch the Par-Tay tonight. Thanks for reading, Jonny! But NYRB is not storing and archiving those books for anyone to search through and comment on, either. Nor would an author or publisher be very happy with such a service (remember the Google book search blowup?).The NYRB was also most likely provided with the text by the publisher. You were not provided with the video by Fox or NBC. You obtained it via RedLasso.If you yourself recorded, excerpted and commented on the same clip, we would have no problem.But a third party was involved, RedLasso. And RedLasso most likely had permission to redistribute under a limited set of circumstances, which their service presumably violated, prompting the lawsuit.TV -> you -> computer -> web == OK.TV -> RedLasso -> you -> web == not so OK.I am going to talk to another clipping service and a few copyright lawyers and see what they say.Hopefully I can get done with my “real work” to watch the Par-Tay tonight. Thanks for reading, Jonny!

]]> http://technosailor.com/2008/07/29/memo-to-bloggers-not-everything-is-free/comment-page-1/#comment-44921 Andrew Feinberg Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:00:41 +0000 http://technosailor.com/?p=4138#comment-44921 But NYRB is not storing and archiving those books for anyone to search through and comment on, either. Nor would an author or publisher be very happy with such a service (remember the Google book search blowup?).The NYRB was also most likely provided with the text by the publisher. You were not provided with the video by Fox or NBC. You obtained it via RedLasso.If you yourself recorded, excerpted and commented on the same clip, we would have no problem.But a third party was involved, RedLasso. And RedLasso most likely had permission to redistribute under a limited set of circumstances, which their service presumably violated, prompting the lawsuit.TV -> you -> computer -> web == OK.TV -> RedLasso -> you -> web == not so OK.I am going to talk to another clipping service and a few copyright lawyers and see what they say.Hopefully I can get done with my "real work" to watch the Par-Tay tonight. Thanks for reading, Jonny! But NYRB is not storing and archiving those books for anyone to search through and comment on, either. Nor would an author or publisher be very happy with such a service (remember the Google book search blowup?).The NYRB was also most likely provided with the text by the publisher. You were not provided with the video by Fox or NBC. You obtained it via RedLasso.If you yourself recorded, excerpted and commented on the same clip, we would have no problem.But a third party was involved, RedLasso. And RedLasso most likely had permission to redistribute under a limited set of circumstances, which their service presumably violated, prompting the lawsuit.TV -> you -> computer -> web == OK.TV -> RedLasso -> you -> web == not so OK.I am going to talk to another clipping service and a few copyright lawyers and see what they say.Hopefully I can get done with my “real work” to watch the Par-Tay tonight. Thanks for reading, Jonny!

]]> http://technosailor.com/2008/07/29/memo-to-bloggers-not-everything-is-free/comment-page-1/#comment-44925 Andrew Feinberg Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:00:41 +0000 http://technosailor.com/?p=4138#comment-44925 But NYRB is not storing and archiving those books for anyone to search through and comment on, either. Nor would an author or publisher be very happy with such a service (remember the Google book search blowup?).The NYRB was also most likely provided with the text by the publisher. You were not provided with the video by Fox or NBC. You obtained it via RedLasso.If you yourself recorded, excerpted and commented on the same clip, we would have no problem.But a third party was involved, RedLasso. And RedLasso most likely had permission to redistribute under a limited set of circumstances, which their service presumably violated, prompting the lawsuit.TV -> you -> computer -> web == OK.TV -> RedLasso -> you -> web == not so OK.I am going to talk to another clipping service and a few copyright lawyers and see what they say.Hopefully I can get done with my "real work" to watch the Par-Tay tonight. Thanks for reading, Jonny! But NYRB is not storing and archiving those books for anyone to search through and comment on, either. Nor would an author or publisher be very happy with such a service (remember the Google book search blowup?).The NYRB was also most likely provided with the text by the publisher. You were not provided with the video by Fox or NBC. You obtained it via RedLasso.If you yourself recorded, excerpted and commented on the same clip, we would have no problem.But a third party was involved, RedLasso. And RedLasso most likely had permission to redistribute under a limited set of circumstances, which their service presumably violated, prompting the lawsuit.TV -> you -> computer -> web == OK.TV -> RedLasso -> you -> web == not so OK.I am going to talk to another clipping service and a few copyright lawyers and see what they say.Hopefully I can get done with my “real work” to watch the Par-Tay tonight. Thanks for reading, Jonny!

]]> http://technosailor.com/2008/07/29/memo-to-bloggers-not-everything-is-free/comment-page-1/#comment-44929 Andrew Feinberg Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:00:41 +0000 http://technosailor.com/?p=4138#comment-44929 But NYRB is not storing and archiving those books for anyone to search through and comment on, either. Nor would an author or publisher be very happy with such a service (remember the Google book search blowup?).The NYRB was also most likely provided with the text by the publisher. You were not provided with the video by Fox or NBC. You obtained it via RedLasso.If you yourself recorded, excerpted and commented on the same clip, we would have no problem.But a third party was involved, RedLasso. And RedLasso most likely had permission to redistribute under a limited set of circumstances, which their service presumably violated, prompting the lawsuit.TV -> you -> computer -> web == OK.TV -> RedLasso -> you -> web == not so OK.I am going to talk to another clipping service and a few copyright lawyers and see what they say.Hopefully I can get done with my "real work" to watch the Par-Tay tonight. Thanks for reading, Jonny! But NYRB is not storing and archiving those books for anyone to search through and comment on, either. Nor would an author or publisher be very happy with such a service (remember the Google book search blowup?).The NYRB was also most likely provided with the text by the publisher. You were not provided with the video by Fox or NBC. You obtained it via RedLasso.If you yourself recorded, excerpted and commented on the same clip, we would have no problem.But a third party was involved, RedLasso. And RedLasso most likely had permission to redistribute under a limited set of circumstances, which their service presumably violated, prompting the lawsuit.TV -> you -> computer -> web == OK.TV -> RedLasso -> you -> web == not so OK.I am going to talk to another clipping service and a few copyright lawyers and see what they say.Hopefully I can get done with my “real work” to watch the Par-Tay tonight. Thanks for reading, Jonny!

]]> http://technosailor.com/2008/07/29/memo-to-bloggers-not-everything-is-free/comment-page-1/#comment-44933 Andrew Feinberg Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:00:41 +0000 http://technosailor.com/?p=4138#comment-44933 But NYRB is not storing and archiving those books for anyone to search through and comment on, either. Nor would an author or publisher be very happy with such a service (remember the Google book search blowup?).The NYRB was also most likely provided with the text by the publisher. You were not provided with the video by Fox or NBC. You obtained it via RedLasso.If you yourself recorded, excerpted and commented on the same clip, we would have no problem.But a third party was involved, RedLasso. And RedLasso most likely had permission to redistribute under a limited set of circumstances, which their service presumably violated, prompting the lawsuit.TV -> you -> computer -> web == OK.TV -> RedLasso -> you -> web == not so OK.I am going to talk to another clipping service and a few copyright lawyers and see what they say.Hopefully I can get done with my "real work" to watch the Par-Tay tonight. Thanks for reading, Jonny! But NYRB is not storing and archiving those books for anyone to search through and comment on, either. Nor would an author or publisher be very happy with such a service (remember the Google book search blowup?).The NYRB was also most likely provided with the text by the publisher. You were not provided with the video by Fox or NBC. You obtained it via RedLasso.If you yourself recorded, excerpted and commented on the same clip, we would have no problem.But a third party was involved, RedLasso. And RedLasso most likely had permission to redistribute under a limited set of circumstances, which their service presumably violated, prompting the lawsuit.TV -> you -> computer -> web == OK.TV -> RedLasso -> you -> web == not so OK.I am going to talk to another clipping service and a few copyright lawyers and see what they say.Hopefully I can get done with my “real work” to watch the Par-Tay tonight. Thanks for reading, Jonny!

]]> http://technosailor.com/2008/07/29/memo-to-bloggers-not-everything-is-free/comment-page-1/#comment-44904 Nathan Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:48:41 +0000 http://technosailor.com/?p=4138#comment-44904 Most copyright statements make an explicit exception for short passages quoted in a review, for what it's worth. It seems to me the law on this remains pretty unclear yet (I'm not a lawyer, though). Most copyright statements make an explicit exception for short passages quoted in a review, for what it’s worth. It seems to me the law on this remains pretty unclear yet (I’m not a lawyer, though).

]]> http://technosailor.com/2008/07/29/memo-to-bloggers-not-everything-is-free/comment-page-1/#comment-44908 Nathan Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:48:41 +0000 http://technosailor.com/?p=4138#comment-44908 Most copyright statements make an explicit exception for short passages quoted in a review, for what it's worth. It seems to me the law on this remains pretty unclear yet (I'm not a lawyer, though). Most copyright statements make an explicit exception for short passages quoted in a review, for what it’s worth. It seems to me the law on this remains pretty unclear yet (I’m not a lawyer, though).

]]> http://technosailor.com/2008/07/29/memo-to-bloggers-not-everything-is-free/comment-page-1/#comment-44912 Nathan Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:48:41 +0000 http://technosailor.com/?p=4138#comment-44912 Most copyright statements make an explicit exception for short passages quoted in a review, for what it's worth. It seems to me the law on this remains pretty unclear yet (I'm not a lawyer, though). Most copyright statements make an explicit exception for short passages quoted in a review, for what it’s worth. It seems to me the law on this remains pretty unclear yet (I’m not a lawyer, though).

]]> http://technosailor.com/2008/07/29/memo-to-bloggers-not-everything-is-free/comment-page-1/#comment-44916 Nathan Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:48:41 +0000 http://technosailor.com/?p=4138#comment-44916 Most copyright statements make an explicit exception for short passages quoted in a review, for what it's worth. It seems to me the law on this remains pretty unclear yet (I'm not a lawyer, though). Most copyright statements make an explicit exception for short passages quoted in a review, for what it’s worth. It seems to me the law on this remains pretty unclear yet (I’m not a lawyer, though).

]]> http://technosailor.com/2008/07/29/memo-to-bloggers-not-everything-is-free/comment-page-1/#comment-44920 Nathan Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:48:41 +0000 http://technosailor.com/?p=4138#comment-44920 Most copyright statements make an explicit exception for short passages quoted in a review, for what it's worth. It seems to me the law on this remains pretty unclear yet (I'm not a lawyer, though). Most copyright statements make an explicit exception for short passages quoted in a review, for what it’s worth. It seems to me the law on this remains pretty unclear yet (I’m not a lawyer, though).

]]> http://technosailor.com/2008/07/29/memo-to-bloggers-not-everything-is-free/comment-page-1/#comment-44924 Nathan Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:48:41 +0000 http://technosailor.com/?p=4138#comment-44924 Most copyright statements make an explicit exception for short passages quoted in a review, for what it's worth. It seems to me the law on this remains pretty unclear yet (I'm not a lawyer, though). Most copyright statements make an explicit exception for short passages quoted in a review, for what it’s worth. It seems to me the law on this remains pretty unclear yet (I’m not a lawyer, though).

]]> http://technosailor.com/2008/07/29/memo-to-bloggers-not-everything-is-free/comment-page-1/#comment-44928 Nathan Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:48:41 +0000 http://technosailor.com/?p=4138#comment-44928 Most copyright statements make an explicit exception for short passages quoted in a review, for what it's worth. It seems to me the law on this remains pretty unclear yet (I'm not a lawyer, though). Most copyright statements make an explicit exception for short passages quoted in a review, for what it’s worth. It seems to me the law on this remains pretty unclear yet (I’m not a lawyer, though).

]]> http://technosailor.com/2008/07/29/memo-to-bloggers-not-everything-is-free/comment-page-1/#comment-44932 Nathan Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:48:41 +0000 http://technosailor.com/?p=4138#comment-44932 Most copyright statements make an explicit exception for short passages quoted in a review, for what it's worth. It seems to me the law on this remains pretty unclear yet (I'm not a lawyer, though). Most copyright statements make an explicit exception for short passages quoted in a review, for what it’s worth. It seems to me the law on this remains pretty unclear yet (I’m not a lawyer, though).

]]> http://technosailor.com/2008/07/29/memo-to-bloggers-not-everything-is-free/comment-page-1/#comment-44903 Aaron Brazell Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:32:01 +0000 http://technosailor.com/?p=4138#comment-44903 I actually agree with you on ad placement, Jonny. I think most of the time, ads placed around video content do not count as monetization of content. If the ads were interwove with the content (intro, outro) then there would be a problem. I actually agree with you on ad placement, Jonny. I think most of the time, ads placed around video content do not count as monetization of content. If the ads were interwove with the content (intro, outro) then there would be a problem.

]]> http://technosailor.com/2008/07/29/memo-to-bloggers-not-everything-is-free/comment-page-1/#comment-44907 Aaron Brazell Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:32:01 +0000 http://technosailor.com/?p=4138#comment-44907 I actually agree with you on ad placement, Jonny. I think most of the time, ads placed around video content do not count as monetization of content. If the ads were interwove with the content (intro, outro) then there would be a problem. I actually agree with you on ad placement, Jonny. I think most of the time, ads placed around video content do not count as monetization of content. If the ads were interwove with the content (intro, outro) then there would be a problem.

]]> http://technosailor.com/2008/07/29/memo-to-bloggers-not-everything-is-free/comment-page-1/#comment-44911 Aaron Brazell Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:32:01 +0000 http://technosailor.com/?p=4138#comment-44911 I actually agree with you on ad placement, Jonny. I think most of the time, ads placed around video content do not count as monetization of content. If the ads were interwove with the content (intro, outro) then there would be a problem. I actually agree with you on ad placement, Jonny. I think most of the time, ads placed around video content do not count as monetization of content. If the ads were interwove with the content (intro, outro) then there would be a problem.

]]> http://technosailor.com/2008/07/29/memo-to-bloggers-not-everything-is-free/comment-page-1/#comment-44915 Aaron Brazell Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:32:01 +0000 http://technosailor.com/?p=4138#comment-44915 I actually agree with you on ad placement, Jonny. I think most of the time, ads placed around video content do not count as monetization of content. If the ads were interwove with the content (intro, outro) then there would be a problem. I actually agree with you on ad placement, Jonny. I think most of the time, ads placed around video content do not count as monetization of content. If the ads were interwove with the content (intro, outro) then there would be a problem.

]]> http://technosailor.com/2008/07/29/memo-to-bloggers-not-everything-is-free/comment-page-1/#comment-44919 Aaron Brazell Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:32:01 +0000 http://technosailor.com/?p=4138#comment-44919 I actually agree with you on ad placement, Jonny. I think most of the time, ads placed around video content do not count as monetization of content. If the ads were interwove with the content (intro, outro) then there would be a problem. I actually agree with you on ad placement, Jonny. I think most of the time, ads placed around video content do not count as monetization of content. If the ads were interwove with the content (intro, outro) then there would be a problem.

]]> http://technosailor.com/2008/07/29/memo-to-bloggers-not-everything-is-free/comment-page-1/#comment-44923 Aaron Brazell Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:32:01 +0000 http://technosailor.com/?p=4138#comment-44923 I actually agree with you on ad placement, Jonny. I think most of the time, ads placed around video content do not count as monetization of content. If the ads were interwove with the content (intro, outro) then there would be a problem. I actually agree with you on ad placement, Jonny. I think most of the time, ads placed around video content do not count as monetization of content. If the ads were interwove with the content (intro, outro) then there would be a problem.

]]> http://technosailor.com/2008/07/29/memo-to-bloggers-not-everything-is-free/comment-page-1/#comment-44927 Aaron Brazell Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:32:01 +0000 http://technosailor.com/?p=4138#comment-44927 I actually agree with you on ad placement, Jonny. I think most of the time, ads placed around video content do not count as monetization of content. If the ads were interwove with the content (intro, outro) then there would be a problem. I actually agree with you on ad placement, Jonny. I think most of the time, ads placed around video content do not count as monetization of content. If the ads were interwove with the content (intro, outro) then there would be a problem.

]]> http://technosailor.com/2008/07/29/memo-to-bloggers-not-everything-is-free/comment-page-1/#comment-44931 Aaron Brazell Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:32:01 +0000 http://technosailor.com/?p=4138#comment-44931 I actually agree with you on ad placement, Jonny. I think most of the time, ads placed around video content do not count as monetization of content. If the ads were interwove with the content (intro, outro) then there would be a problem. I actually agree with you on ad placement, Jonny. I think most of the time, ads placed around video content do not count as monetization of content. If the ads were interwove with the content (intro, outro) then there would be a problem.

]]> http://technosailor.com/2008/07/29/memo-to-bloggers-not-everything-is-free/comment-page-1/#comment-44902 jonny goldstein Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:26:58 +0000 http://technosailor.com/?p=4138#comment-44902 I don't get it Andrew. Let's take a print example---say the New York Review of books prints a short excerpt from a book so it can comment on it, that's considered fair use, right? Yet there are ads running right next to that book review. So what's the diff between that and showing a video clip on my website w/google ads in the side bar? I don’t get it Andrew. Let’s take a print example—say the New York Review of books prints a short excerpt from a book so it can comment on it, that’s considered fair use, right? Yet there are ads running right next to that book review. So what’s the diff between that and showing a video clip on my website w/google ads in the side bar?

]]> http://technosailor.com/2008/07/29/memo-to-bloggers-not-everything-is-free/comment-page-1/#comment-44906 jonny goldstein Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:26:58 +0000 http://technosailor.com/?p=4138#comment-44906 I don't get it Andrew. Let's take a print example---say the New York Review of books prints a short excerpt from a book so it can comment on it, that's considered fair use, right? Yet there are ads running right next to that book review. So what's the diff between that and showing a video clip on my website w/google ads in the side bar? I don’t get it Andrew. Let’s take a print example—say the New York Review of books prints a short excerpt from a book so it can comment on it, that’s considered fair use, right? Yet there are ads running right next to that book review. So what’s the diff between that and showing a video clip on my website w/google ads in the side bar?

]]> http://technosailor.com/2008/07/29/memo-to-bloggers-not-everything-is-free/comment-page-1/#comment-44910 jonny goldstein Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:26:58 +0000 http://technosailor.com/?p=4138#comment-44910 I don't get it Andrew. Let's take a print example---say the New York Review of books prints a short excerpt from a book so it can comment on it, that's considered fair use, right? Yet there are ads running right next to that book review. So what's the diff between that and showing a video clip on my website w/google ads in the side bar? I don’t get it Andrew. Let’s take a print example—say the New York Review of books prints a short excerpt from a book so it can comment on it, that’s considered fair use, right? Yet there are ads running right next to that book review. So what’s the diff between that and showing a video clip on my website w/google ads in the side bar?

]]> http://technosailor.com/2008/07/29/memo-to-bloggers-not-everything-is-free/comment-page-1/#comment-44914 jonny goldstein Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:26:58 +0000 http://technosailor.com/?p=4138#comment-44914 I don't get it Andrew. Let's take a print example---say the New York Review of books prints a short excerpt from a book so it can comment on it, that's considered fair use, right? Yet there are ads running right next to that book review. So what's the diff between that and showing a video clip on my website w/google ads in the side bar? I don’t get it Andrew. Let’s take a print example—say the New York Review of books prints a short excerpt from a book so it can comment on it, that’s considered fair use, right? Yet there are ads running right next to that book review. So what’s the diff between that and showing a video clip on my website w/google ads in the side bar?

]]> http://technosailor.com/2008/07/29/memo-to-bloggers-not-everything-is-free/comment-page-1/#comment-44918 jonny goldstein Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:26:58 +0000 http://technosailor.com/?p=4138#comment-44918 I don't get it Andrew. Let's take a print example---say the New York Review of books prints a short excerpt from a book so it can comment on it, that's considered fair use, right? Yet there are ads running right next to that book review. So what's the diff between that and showing a video clip on my website w/google ads in the side bar? I don’t get it Andrew. Let’s take a print example—say the New York Review of books prints a short excerpt from a book so it can comment on it, that’s considered fair use, right? Yet there are ads running right next to that book review. So what’s the diff between that and showing a video clip on my website w/google ads in the side bar?

]]> http://technosailor.com/2008/07/29/memo-to-bloggers-not-everything-is-free/comment-page-1/#comment-44922 jonny goldstein Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:26:58 +0000 http://technosailor.com/?p=4138#comment-44922 I don't get it Andrew. Let's take a print example---say the New York Review of books prints a short excerpt from a book so it can comment on it, that's considered fair use, right? Yet there are ads running right next to that book review. So what's the diff between that and showing a video clip on my website w/google ads in the side bar? I don’t get it Andrew. Let’s take a print example—say the New York Review of books prints a short excerpt from a book so it can comment on it, that’s considered fair use, right? Yet there are ads running right next to that book review. So what’s the diff between that and showing a video clip on my website w/google ads in the side bar?

]]>