<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SEO and Personal Brand is not dead. If you innovate.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technosailor.com/2008/11/11/seo-and-personal-brand-is-not-dead-if-you-innovate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technosailor.com/2008/11/11/seo-and-personal-brand-is-not-dead-if-you-innovate/</link>
	<description>Business and Technology with Common Sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:20:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-alpha-19888</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Murray</title>
		<link>http://technosailor.com/2008/11/11/seo-and-personal-brand-is-not-dead-if-you-innovate/comment-page-1/#comment-45945</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Murray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technosailor.com/?p=4804#comment-45945</guid>
		<description>I liked the June blog entry you did on Doers vs. Talkers, Aaron, and realize that I&#039;ve been a bit prejudiced against Talkers (&quot;Oh, he&#039;s nothing but a talker.&quot;) when they do have something to add to the table with visionary ideas and sometimes challenging conventional thinking.

With whether SEO is dead and personal brand, I work for a tech-focused PR agency, and the more I know about different components of social media and traditional PR - including brand management and organic SEO - the better I am as a counselor to my clients, many of whom have limited background in these areas. I&#039;m sure over time SEO will evolve,  just like anything else. My perspective is that organic SEO is a tool in the arsenal that I can bring forth to serve clients.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked the June blog entry you did on Doers vs. Talkers, Aaron, and realize that I&#8217;ve been a bit prejudiced against Talkers (&#8220;Oh, he&#8217;s nothing but a talker.&#8221;) when they do have something to add to the table with visionary ideas and sometimes challenging conventional thinking.</p>
<p>With whether SEO is dead and personal brand, I work for a tech-focused PR agency, and the more I know about different components of social media and traditional PR &#8211; including brand management and organic SEO &#8211; the better I am as a counselor to my clients, many of whom have limited background in these areas. I&#8217;m sure over time SEO will evolve,  just like anything else. My perspective is that organic SEO is a tool in the arsenal that I can bring forth to serve clients.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Brazell</title>
		<link>http://technosailor.com/2008/11/11/seo-and-personal-brand-is-not-dead-if-you-innovate/comment-page-1/#comment-45944</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Brazell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 14:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technosailor.com/?p=4804#comment-45944</guid>
		<description>It takes awhile for my readers to marinate on my deep thoughts. They are not impulsive. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It takes awhile for my readers to marinate on my deep thoughts. They are not impulsive. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micah Baldwin</title>
		<link>http://technosailor.com/2008/11/11/seo-and-personal-brand-is-not-dead-if-you-innovate/comment-page-1/#comment-45943</link>
		<dc:creator>Micah Baldwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 05:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technosailor.com/?p=4804#comment-45943</guid>
		<description>Given the number of comments on Geoff&#039;s post (48) and on my post (53) versus yours (0), I would say, that you might not be correct here... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the number of comments on Geoff&#8217;s post (48) and on my post (53) versus yours (0), I would say, that you might not be correct here&#8230; :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://technosailor.com/2008/11/11/seo-and-personal-brand-is-not-dead-if-you-innovate/comment-page-1/#comment-45942</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 04:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technosailor.com/?p=4804#comment-45942</guid>
		<description>I really liked the article on doers vs. talkers. I couldn&#039;t comment on his post about it, so I figure I should comment on it here. Anyways, here&#039;s a snippet from a post I created last week, &quot;Why Ideas are Worthless.&quot;

&lt;i&gt;&quot;As a VC Analyst, I hear a lot of pitches. A lot.

And most people come to me with an ideaâ€“a thoughtâ€“and of course, theyâ€™ve hit the honeymoon period where they think itâ€™s the next google.

Every single one of them is coming to me for one reason: money. I love it! Itâ€™s my job. And, I love entrepreneurs. The passion, the energy and the brain-power is mind-opening.

However, many come for the wrong reason. The reason many want the money is so that they can test the idea. They say to themselves, â€œWell, itâ€™s clearly a great idea because I think so. All I need is a programmer. And that means I need money. Let me go apply to 100 local VCâ€™s and tell them all that my idea is the best thing ever, and that I donâ€™t need themâ€“I just need their money to use on a programmer.â€

Technical, or not, I tell them all the same thing, â€œPut up or shut up.â€

Even if itâ€™s a poor sketch of what your product is, launch it. Just slap up a [beta] tag next to your logo as a proclamation of, â€œHey, here I am. I think this could be great. It may have some kinks, but tell me what you think and we can grow from here.â€

At the end of the day, ideas are worthless.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

http://scottdig.com/2008/11/06/why-ideas-are-worthless/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really liked the article on doers vs. talkers. I couldn&#8217;t comment on his post about it, so I figure I should comment on it here. Anyways, here&#8217;s a snippet from a post I created last week, &#8220;Why Ideas are Worthless.&#8221;</p>
<p><i>&#8220;As a VC Analyst, I hear a lot of pitches. A lot.</p>
<p>And most people come to me with an ideaâ€“a thoughtâ€“and of course, theyâ€™ve hit the honeymoon period where they think itâ€™s the next google.</p>
<p>Every single one of them is coming to me for one reason: money. I love it! Itâ€™s my job. And, I love entrepreneurs. The passion, the energy and the brain-power is mind-opening.</p>
<p>However, many come for the wrong reason. The reason many want the money is so that they can test the idea. They say to themselves, â€œWell, itâ€™s clearly a great idea because I think so. All I need is a programmer. And that means I need money. Let me go apply to 100 local VCâ€™s and tell them all that my idea is the best thing ever, and that I donâ€™t need themâ€“I just need their money to use on a programmer.â€</p>
<p>Technical, or not, I tell them all the same thing, â€œPut up or shut up.â€</p>
<p>Even if itâ€™s a poor sketch of what your product is, launch it. Just slap up a [beta] tag next to your logo as a proclamation of, â€œHey, here I am. I think this could be great. It may have some kinks, but tell me what you think and we can grow from here.â€</p>
<p>At the end of the day, ideas are worthless.&#8221;</i></p>
<p><a href="http://scottdig.com/2008/11/06/why-ideas-are-worthless/" >http://scottdig.com/2008/11/06/why-ideas-are-worthless/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

