<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Technosailor.com &#187; Linux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technosailor.com/tag/linux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technosailor.com</link>
	<description>Business and Technology with Common Sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-alpha-19888</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google Chrome OS: A lot to do about Nothing</title>
		<link>http://technosailor.com/2009/07/09/google-chrome-os-a-lot-to-do-about-nothing/</link>
		<comments>http://technosailor.com/2009/07/09/google-chrome-os-a-lot-to-do-about-nothing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aaron Brazell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google chrome os]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technosailor.com/?p=7687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google is known for doing many things right. Despite giving them a hard time over the years, it&#8217;s undeniable that my life still revolves, in a very real way, around Google products. I use Gmail not only for, er, Gmail &#8230; <a href="http://technosailor.com/2009/07/09/google-chrome-os-a-lot-to-do-about-nothing/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is known for doing many things right. Despite <a href="http://technosailor.com/2008/09/05/google-shiny-is-not-as-hot-as-you-would-think/">giving them</a> a <a href="http://technosailor.com/2008/09/02/google-blog-platform/">hard time</a> <a href="http://technosailor.com/2009/02/10/vetoing-feedburner/">over</a> the <a href="http://technosailor.com/2007/05/24/open-letter-to-google-feedburner/">years</a>, it&#8217;s undeniable that my life still revolves, in a very real way, around Google products. I use <a href="http://gmail.com">Gmail</a> not only for, er, Gmail but I use <a href="http://google.com/a">Google Apps</a> to run all my email services including my public <a href="mailto:aaron@technosailor.com">aaron@technosailor.com</a> email.</p>
<p>Likewise, my analytics for this and other sites is <a href="http://google.com/analytics">Google Analytics</a> (for those scared by big words, analytics is how I measure traffic and visitor interaction on the site). This blog, which is powered by WordPress, implements <a href="http://gears.google.com">Google Gears</a> to speed up transactions on the backend and Gears is used also to provide offline support to Google apps I run.</p>
<p>Google Search probably will never be replaced by <a href="http://bing.com">Bing</a> in my world.</p>
<p>My BlackBerry has a Gmail app and <a href="http://maps.google.com">Google Maps</a>, both of which I find to be imperative. Likewise, I use <a href="http://www.google.com/talk/">Google Talk</a> for IM and I have apps for that on both my BlackBerry as well as my iPod Touch (The Jesus phone without the Great Satan called AT&amp;T).</p>
<p>In other words, try as I might, I can&#8217;t not love Google for so many things.</p>
<p>Yet&#8230; I just can&#8217;t get excited about the announcement in recent days that<a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/07/introducing-google-chrome-os.html"> Google is coming out with a new operating system</a>, expected in 2010, that will be based on it&#8217;s Google Chrome browser (which I don&#8217;t use because it&#8217;s Windows only).<br />
<img src="http://technosailor.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/google-chrome-logo-250x250.jpg" alt="google-chrome-logo" width="250" height="250" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-7688" /><br />
For all that Google has done right, they completely just insulted us and most of us haven&#8217;t even figured it out yet. We&#8217;re all caught up in Shiny Object Syndrome, the likes of which are similar to Applegasms surrounding a new &#8220;<a href="http://apple.com">Our Father who Art in Cupertino</a>&#8221; product launch. We&#8217;re just not thinking straight.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s why.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/chrome">Google Chrome</a> is a Browser. While it&#8217;s a powerful browser, it is simply a browser. It cannot run applications. It cannot mangle CPU cycles, assign process IDs to other applications, or control memory allocation for an entire computer. It&#8217;s not built that way. It&#8217;s built to be a browser.</p>
<p>The evidence that Google knows this (and <a href="http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2009/07/lets-all-take-deep-breath-and-get-some.html">Fake Steve Jobs does a nice job of pointing out <em>why</em> Operating Systems take 20 years to build</a> <em>right</em>) is that it plans to use a Linux kernel. There you have it. <strong>A Linux kernel.</strong></p>
<p>Ah ha, you might say. Linux has been proven to be an exceptional embedded operating system over the years, and with that, I&#8217;ll agree with you. It makes perfect sense why Google would build their new operating system on Linux. It&#8217;s proven its ability over the years to be an operating system for many devices, computer and non-computer alike. Why change now. God, those kids are smart over at Google.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the thing&#8230; All of the technology pundits, and Google themselves, are calling it a new operating system&#8230; when it&#8217;s far from it.</p>
<p>In fact, Google should be calling it a new Desktop Manager similar to <a href="http://kde.org/">KDE</a>, <a href="http://www.gnome.org/">Gnome</a> or, heck, even the desktop manager app that&#8217;s built on Open BSD for the Mac OS X software. The operating system <em>is</em> Linux. For what it&#8217;s worth, Mac OS X should probably be called a Desktop Manager software too because it&#8217;s built on BSD, a Unix variant.</p>
<p>There is nothing about an upcoming Google Chrome OS that can operate a system. Not within a year. That&#8217;s why they are using Linux.</p>
<p>I love Google, but folks need to step back and be a little objective. I mean, <em>just</em> a little.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technosailor.com/2009/07/09/google-chrome-os-a-lot-to-do-about-nothing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://technosailor.com/files/google-chrome-logo-250x250.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://technosailor.com/files/google-chrome-logo.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">google-chrome-logo</media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://technosailor.com/files/google-chrome-logo-250x250.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

