<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Technosailor.com &#187; planning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technosailor.com/tag/planning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technosailor.com</link>
	<description>Business and Technology with Common Sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-alpha-19888</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Get a Management System &#8212; Now</title>
		<link>http://technosailor.com/2008/10/10/get-a-management-system-now/</link>
		<comments>http://technosailor.com/2008/10/10/get-a-management-system-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 22:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Venture Files]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[basecamp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quarterly objectives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ranking and rating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work week calendar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technosailor.com/?p=4608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a continuation of the series that began with Startups Need Management, Too All the warnings about the forthcoming next nuclear winter for startups drive home the need for a management system. Tough times call for tough measures, but &#8230; <a href="http://technosailor.com/2008/10/10/get-a-management-system-now/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This is a continuation of the series that began with</em> <a href="http://technosailor.com/2008/10/08/startups-need-management-too/">Startups Need Management, Too</a></p>
<p><img src="http://technosailor.com/files/tps-report2.jpg" border="0" alt="tps report2.jpg" width="367" height="194" align="left" />All the <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/eldon/sequoia-capital-on-startups-and-the-economic-downturn-presentation?type=powerpoint">warnings</a> about the forthcoming next nuclear winter for startups drive home the need for a management system.  Tough times call for tough measures, but that doesn&#8217;t mean CEOs should get carte blanche for discretionary cuts &#8212; a sure way to undermine morale.</p>
<p>Among other things, having a management process in place sets the stage for making cuts when they need to be made.  Why? Because even without resorting to old-school <a href="http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,129988,00.html">ranking-and-rating</a>, in a good management system, performances (and non-performances) are visible company-wide.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still stunned at how many companies operate without a management process of some kind.  Not just a plan . . . but a <em>regularly recurring</em> process, with weekly monitoring, that ensures critical company milestones are met &#8212; and leads to consequences if it&#8217;s not.</p>
<p>So if you haven&#8217;t got one, now is a helluva good time to get started on a planning/management process.  If your company has one in place, dramatic events may call for a mid-cycle re-plan.</p>
<p>The argument for doing quarterly planning is its horizon &#8212; it&#8217;s hard to see much beyond 13 weeks.  Who can really say they know what conditions will be like come January 1, 2009?  Much less for a 3- or 5-year plan.</p>
<p>(Which is not to say your company doesn&#8217;t need long-term goals.  VCs usually only want to see 3- to 5-year plans as a reality check (or sanity check).  They know better than anyone that even the startups that succeed rarely do so by adhering to the plan they funded. But it&#8217;s a good test for founders, to articulate whether they have their sites set on a profitable $15M business two years out . . . or are going for global domination of mobile advertising by Year 5.)</p>
<p>Back to quarterly planning &#8212; and in particular the elements of <a href="http://technosailor.com/2008/10/08/startups-need-management-too/">Quarterly Objectives and Key Results</a> that I brought up in the last post.  Although the process needs to evolve within any company, the basic premises are three:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>1. Top-management expectations come first.</strong> Could be just a one-sheet with simple but clear expectations for, say, sales, shipments, user registrations, feature releases &#8212; whatever the major performance metrics for the quarter are.  Whether or not there&#8217;s a board of directors asking for it, it&#8217;s the CEO&#8217;s job.</p>
<p><strong>2. <em>Every</em> exempt employee prepares a set of Objectives &amp; Key Results.</strong> If the company is big enough to have departments, employees work with their managers to develop them &#8212;  four to six Objectives with  four to six Key Results (more on these below).</p>
<p><strong>3. After each quarter, Objectives are reviewed and self-graded, and next quarter&#8217;s are proposed, <em>in a peer setting.</em></strong> Key here is that each employee acknowledges what happened last quarter &#8212; and what they&#8217;ll do next quarter &#8212; in the presence of their peers.</p></blockquote>
<p>Now, some are you are sitting there saying, <em>&#8220;Sounds like big-company bullshit.&#8221;</em> To which I say, <em>&#8220;Bullshit.&#8221;</em> (Touché!)  Do you really think everyone working hard, with a good attitude is a way to ensure milestones are met?  To ensure that roles, much less departments, are coordinated?  No.  Not only is there too much to keep in any one&#8217;s head, but things change.  All the time.  If you have your eye on the goal &#8212; pin it to the wall in front of you &#8212; and you monitor weekly, big surprises are far less likely.</p>
<p><em>&#8220;Inch by inch is a cinch &#8212; yard by yard is hard&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Corny, but it makes a point: monitor progress every week.</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t suggest that even this &#8216;simple&#8217;process I&#8217;m recommending isn&#8217;t pain-free.  There are usually several iterations, especially when multiple departments (engineering, marketing, sales) dependencies are getting sorted out <em>(&#8220;I can&#8217;t launch Week 44 unless Tom agrees to freeze code by Week 40&#8243;)</em></p>
<p>But at the end of the exercise, every employee &#8212; the CEO is not exempt &#8212; has a roadmap of the most important things for them to focus on over the next 13 weeks.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t emphasize how effective this process (or one like it) is in not only getting things done, but in maintaining employee morale.  There&#8217;s no hiding, no slacking &#8212; everyone&#8217;s work is visible.  No more <em>&#8220;What the hell does Chris do?&#8221;</em> Everyone&#8217;s Objectives are on the server (or intranet, or <a href="http://www.basecamphq.com/">Basecamp</a>, or whatever you&#8217;re using).  And every week at your staff meeting (what &#8212; you still don&#8217;t believe in meetings?), all the Objectives (sorted by week) are checked off . . . again, in front of peers.  (Peer performance is a great motivator &#8212; no one wants to show up for Monday morning&#8217;s meeting and get marked &#8216;Not Done&#8217;in front of others.)</p>
<p><strong>What the Docs Look Like</strong></p>
<p><img src="http://technosailor.com/files/qo-pic1.jpg" border="0" alt="QO pic.jpg" width="432" height="410" align="right" />Though few words, drafting of Objectives and Key Results takes some time to get the hang of.  In general, I would describe each employee&#8217;s four- to six-page document as:</p>
<p><em>&#8216;A guide which, if 75% to 85% achieved, would signify successful execution for the quarter.&#8217;</em></p>
<p>Why only 75% to 85%? Because everyone should have stretch goals  . . . and therefore should not be expected to hit 100% of them.</p>
<p>So how is each Objective expressed?  It should be broad, categorical, and have no dates.  Examples might be &#8216;RELEASE v1.5,&#8217;or &#8216;SECURE MANUFACTURING PARTNERSHIP,&#8217;or &#8216;GROW SALES AT LEAST 10% Y/Y,&#8217;or &#8216;COMMENCE PATENT PROCESS,&#8217;or &#8216;EXPAND DEVELOPMENT TEAM.&#8217; They&#8217;re allowed to sound vague &#8212; they&#8217;re the Big Efforts, and each individual should have at most six.  Any more, and people are being set up to fail.  Put each one at the top of a separate page.</p>
<p>The steps &#8212; specific milestones &#8212; to achieving each Objective &#8212; are quantified by Key Results, which are measurable, and include dates (in our <a href="http://theclosetentrepreneur.com/2008-workweek-calendar">work-week</a> format).  Again, try to have four to six of them.  So your CTO&#8217;s Objective &#8216;RELEASE v1.5&#8242; might have the following Key Results: &#8216;FREEZE CODE W40,&#8217;&#8216;COMPLETE QA W43,&#8217;&#8216;COMPLETE USER TESTING W47,&#8217;&#8216;FINAL REVISION W49,&#8217;&#8216;BLOG RELEASE NOTES W50, and &#8216;UPLOAD v1.5 W51&#8242; (although a Christmas release may be unduly harsh on your development team).</p>
<p>The idea is to give focus your very busy people on the few items &#8212; Objectives &#8212; that really matter.  An while Objectives are mostly vague, Key Results use specific action verbs &#8212; &#8216;COMPLETE,&#8217;&#8216;HIRE,&#8217;&#8216;ANNOUNCE,&#8217;not &#8216;Continue,&#8217;Investigate,&#8217;&#8216;Study,&#8217;etc. &#8212; so that there&#8217;s no ambiguity as to what &#8216;Done&#8217;means.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s much more than can be spelled out here.  And many ways to skin this cat.  (Apologies to cat lovers.)  Finally, while this is an example of a process to help keep the company&#8217;s execution on track, there&#8217;s another dimension (which I&#8217;ll address in a subsequent post): people management.  They&#8217;re <em>not</em> the same.</p>
<p>Especially in these dark days, this is intended to get you thinking about taking real steps to get your team to pull together and sharpen execution &#8212; even if there are only two of you.  Exercises like this force you to articulate your thinking, and you&#8217;ll be surprised how often your partners, whom you talk to every day, are surprised.</p>
<p><em>If you&#8217;d like to receive a more detailed description and examples of Quarterly Objectives and Key Results, email me at rcapece at technosailor dot com.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technosailor.com/2008/10/10/get-a-management-system-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://technosailor.com/files/tps-report2.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://technosailor.com/files/tps-report2.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">tps report2.jpg</media:title>
		</media:content>
		<media:content url="http://technosailor.com/files/qo-pic1.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">QO pic.jpg</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

